EDUCATION FOR A FREE NATION
105 Peavey Rd, Suite 116, Chaska, MN 55318
952-361-4931
www.edwatch.org -
edwatch@lakes.com
November 15, 2006
New House Minority
Leader Voter Guide
Parental Rights & Educational
Freedom
New candidates added to the list
INTRODUCTION:
The Republican in the US House of Representatives, now in the minority
after Tuesdays elections, will be electing three leaders on
Friday November 17th. The
positions
and candidates involved are:
HOUSE MINORITY LEADER ( 3 candidates)
Joe
Barton
John Boehner
Texas -
6th
Ohio - 8th
First elected
1984
First elected
1990
Currently Chairman
of
Currently House
Majority Leader
Committee on Energy and Commerce
Mike
Pence
Indiana -
6th
First elected
2000
Currently Chairman
of
the Republican Study Committee
MINORITY WHIP (2 candidates)
Roy
Blunt
John
Shadegg
Missouri -
7th
Arizona -
3rd
First elected
1996
First elected
1994
Currently Majority Whip
Former
Chairman of
the Republican
Study Committee
HOUSE REPUBLICAN CONFERENCE COMMITTEE (4
candidates)
Marsha
Blackburn
Jack
Kingston
Tennessee -
7th
Georgia -
1st
First elected
2002
First elected
1992
Currently Assistant Majority Whip
Currently
Vice-Chairman
of
the House
Republican Conference
Dan Lungren
Adam Putnam
California -
3rd
Florida - 12th
First elected
1978
First
elected 2000
Currently Chairman
of
Currently Chairman
the Homeland Security Subcommitte
Republican Policy Committee
on Economic Security,
Infrastructure
Protection, and
Cybersecurity
These elections have major ramifications for the philosophy and
direction of the Congress on many topics, including whether or not the
unconstitutional federal expansion into education, mental health, and
family life will continue unchecked.
EdAction has composed this voters guide of the legislative record of the
candidates for the three major leadership posts in the areas of K-12
education and mental health screening and drugging to give our readers a
picture of the candidates on these very important issues. Please
use this guide to examine the stances of the candidates in each
leadership race and urge your Republican Member of Congress to support
the candidate that aligns most closely with your views. Please spread the
word to families and friends that care about freedom and parents
rights.
1) K-12 EDUCATION NO CHILD LEFT
BEHIND:
No Child Left Behind (NCLB), the 2001 version of the Elementary
and Secondary Education Act (ESEA), is up for reauthorization in the next
Congress. Despite a few freedom-affirming amendments, NCLB authored
during John Boehners tenure as chairman of the Education and Workforce
Committee, has been a disaster for academic education, for preparing
American children to live as free citizens in a constitutional republic,
for parental rights, and for national sovereignty. NCLB has also expanded
early childhood programs and the psychologizing of education via many
dangerous and ineffective mental health programs. It has put into
hyper-drive the unconstitutional federal interference in education that
began in earnest in 1965 with the ESEAs passage. Detailed
background on NCLB, as well as the federal laws and international
agreements that undergird it, is available at
www.edwatch.org and in two books by
Allen Quist FedEd :
The New Federal Curriculum and How Its Enforced and
Americas Schools:
The Battleground for Freedom.
A NO
vote on NCLB
is a vote for freedom:
Barton:
Yes
Boehner:
Yes
Pence:
No
Blunt:
Yes
Shadegg
: No
Blackburn:
Not in Congress during passage
Kingston
: Yes
Lungren:
Not in Congress during passage
Putnam:
Yes
2) UNIVERSAL MENTAL HEALTH
SCREENING: A serious side effect of growing federal
control in education and the accountability movement is that every aspect
of students' and their families' lives is thought to affect a students
performance and by extension, the school's performance and funding.
Schools then try to evaluate, account for, control, and treat all of
these different areas that are the responsibility of families and should
be completely outside the purview of government entities. One of the most
dangerous and insidious areas in which education and government have
become involved is the social and emotional or mental health of children.
Education, mental health, and government experts have been trying to
promote mental health screening of very young children in order to
prevent mental illness and improve academic performance. Among the many
problems with this approach is that mental health diagnoses are vague,
subjective, often politically motivated, and are especially difficult to
accurately apply to children.
Since the New Freedom Commission on Mental Health final report in 2004
which recommended the mental health screening of all American citizens
starting in preschool and the use of powerful, ineffective, and dangerous
psychiatric drugs EdAction and a whole coalition of national groups,
professionals, parents, and concerned citizens have been fighting to
reign in federal mental health programs and protect families from coerced
mental health screening. Background is available
here and
here.
- THE PARENTAL CONSENT ACT (HR
181) This bill authored by Congressman and physician Ron
Paul requires written, informed voluntary, parental consent for any
federally funded mental health screening program. It also prohibits
federal funding for any program that would promote the charging a parent
with child abuse or neglect for refusing to submit their child for a
mental health screening program. This bill was introduced in 2005
and has 44 cosponsors, but has not yet received a hearing.
- A YES on
co-sponsorship of HR 181 supports freedom and parental rights:
- Barton:
No
Boehner:
No
Pence:
Yes
- Blunt:
No
Shadegg
:
No
- Blackburn:
Yes
Kingston
: No
- Lungren
:
No
Putnam
:
No
- Amendments to prohibit funding for
universal mental health screening programs Congressman
Paul has sponsored amendments to the Labor/HHS/Education appropriations
bill for the last two years to prohibit federal funds for universal
mental health screening programs.
- A "YES" vote on these
amendments supports freedom and parental
rights:
-
FY
2005 (September 9, 2004)
- Barton:
No
Boehner:
No
Pence:
Yes
- Blunt:
No
Shadegg
:
Yes
- Blackburn:
Yes
Kingston
:
Yes
- Lungren:
Not in Congress during
passage
Putnam:
No
- FY
2006 (June 24,
2005
)
- Barton:
No
Boehner:
No
Pence:
Yes
- Blunt:
No
Shadegg
:
Yes
- Blackburn:
Yes
Kingston
:
Yes
- Lungren
:
No
Putnam
:
No
3) COERCED PSYCHIATRIC
DRUGGING:
Another outgrowth of the expansion of mental health in the schools
is the coerced drugging of children with powerful psychotropic
drugs. There has been a spate of incidents around the country in
which schools have threatened or instigated charges of child abuse, child
neglect, or educational neglect when parents have refused or discontinued
these medications. The drugs like Ritalin and Prozac have serious,
sometimes lethal side effects such as hallucinations, suicide, and
violence and have proven in study after study to be ineffective in
children for the treatment of depression and attention deficit
disorder. (See
a summary of some of
this research) John Boehner did work to pass a bill that became part
of the special education reauthorization (IDEA) last year that prohibited
federal funding for special education programs that allowed this type of
coercion with certain psychiatric drugs, but not all of them. A
stand-alone version of that bill that would have applied to all students
authored passed the House 425-1 in 2003, but was blocked in the
Senate. An expanded version of the Child Medication Safety Act (HR
1790) authored by Rep. John Kline (R-MN) and co-sponsored by Mr. Boehner
that would protect ALL students from coercion with ANY psychiatric drug
was introduced in 2005. The same version that passed in IDEA
covering coercion with only the controlled substances passed the House on
November 16, 2005 by a vote of 407-12. (See
our
report.)
- A YES vote on the
Child Medication Safety Act is a vote for freedom and parental
rights:
- Barton:
Yes
Boehner:
Yes
Pence:
Yes
- Blunt:
Yes
Shadegg
:
Yes
- Blackburn:
Yes
Kingston
:
Yes
- Lungren
:
Yes
Putnam
: Yes
105 Peavey Rd, Suite 116, Chaska, MN 55318 - 952-361-4931
www.edwatch.org -
edwatch@lakes.com
EdWatch is entirely user-supported. The continuation of our research and
distribution work depends upon individual contributors.
Click here to contribute
to our work. To subscribe or unsubscribe to this EdWatch e-mail service,
mail to:
edwatch@lakes.com. Put "subscribe" or
"unsubscribe" in the SUBJECT of the message.
EdWatch
shopping cart here.