EDUCATION FOR A FREE NATION
105 Peavey Rd, Suite 116, Chaska, MN 55318
952-361-4931
www.edwatch.org -
edwatch@lakes.com
January 25, 2006
Taxpayer Funds Promote Child
Screening & Drugging
The Abramoff scandal pales in comparison to the stench of the mental health establishments influence over
government, causing our children to be labeled in infancy and creating a
never-ending market for psychiatric drugs.
Sadly, here is another case where the rhetoric of government officials
and agencies bears no resemblance to reality and the truth. This
time it involves our children being labeled mentally ill in infancy by
vague and politically motivated criteria and becoming lifelong dependents
on ineffective and dangerous medications. The cost of these deceptions to
our children, our freedoms of conscience and religion, our parental
authority, and our treasure will be incalculable.
During the
October 17th,
2005 meeting with Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services
Administrator (SAMHSA) administrator Charles Curie, Mr. Curie made some
significant statements. The statements were made to EdWatch, AHRP, and
other members of the coalition of national groups opposing universal
mental health screening and psychiatric drugging that are recommended in
the New Freedom Commission (NFC) report. The recommendations are being
implemented and funded by the federal government, state laws, and private
and government grants.
Curie admitted the lack of scientific validity of the Texas Medication
Algorithm Project (TMAP) psychiatric drug program. He also stated that
TeenScreen is no longer a model program. The facts are, however, that
both TMAP and
TeenScreen are still present and/or receiving federal funding. His
other statements in the October meeting included:
- The New Freedom Commission report is not official Bush
Administration policy, but rather the unofficial recommendations of an
appointed commission.
- The state incentive transformation grants (SITG), funded at $26
million in the FY 2006 appropriations bill, are merely for infrastructure
for states to set up their individual transformation plans for a
recovery oriented system.
- The Federal Mental Health Action Agenda (FMHAA or Action Agenda) is
not really a blueprint or road map for implementing the NFC report.
It took only a cursory review of the Action Agenda and other SAMHSA
documents to see that none of these statements is true:
- The NFC recommendations are clearly administration
policy. SAMHSA admits in the very first paragraph of the
Action
Agenda that the five principles around which the New Freedom
Commission on Mental Health framed its work embody the vision of
transformation that will guide the challenging but necessary work that
lies ahead.
The NFC report is the very foundation of the federal Action Agenda.
This Agenda involves at least 13 different offices and agencies within
the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and at least five
different cabinet level departments. It includes the Department of
Education, where many ineffective and dangerous federal mental health
programs, like Foundations for Learning for 0-7 year olds (see
Dr. Effrems
description of this program) and the politically correct "Early
Warning, Timely Response" (see the
quote regarding intolerance from the Department of Educations
website for this program) are already rampant from preschool to high
school.
- State Incentive Grants are implementing the NFC
recommendation. Despite Mr. Curies assurances to us and to
Congress, and despite
protestations by
Representatives Ralph
Regula (R-OH),
Tim Murphy (D-PA) and
Grace Napolitano (D-CA) that the State Incentive Grants (funded by
Congress at $26 million for FY 2006) are merely for planning, they are
being used to implement the NFC recommendation. These involve early
universal mental health screening across the life span, including
preschoolers and 52 million public school children, as well as the push
for infant mental health screening in the
Action
Agenda. These also include referral to treatment involving
government psychiatric drug programs like the NFC model program, TMAP.
The 2004
SAMHSA Matrix
brochure says, SAMHSA is investing more than $517 million in
transformation efforts, including $47 million to fund the State Incentive
Grants for Transformation program to enable States to begin
implementing the Commissions findings. [Emphasis added.]
- The Action Agenda is the means to implement the NFC
recommendations. Both the Action Agenda itself and several
other SAMHSA documents contain statements such as, CMHS [Center for
Mental Health Services within SAMHSA] has contracted with a number of
national mental health organizations to provide technical assistance to
States in the development of activities and plans to
implement the New Freedom Commission recommendations.
[Emphasis added.]
Not only is there an enormous discrepancy between Mr. Curies
statements and the facts, but the agency also admits in the Action Agenda
and accompanying documents that it is using our tax dollars to recruit
non-governmental organizations (NGOs) to implement the NFC
recommendations:
- The Center for Mental Health Services (CMHS) within SAMHSA, as part
of the technical assistance program mentioned above, has used taxpayer
funds to contract with the National Association of State Mental Health
Program Directors (NASMHPD) to coordinate this project and to collaborate
with six subcontractors: the Judge David L. Bazelon Center for Mental
Health Law, the Federation of Families for Childrens Mental Health, the
National Alliance for the Mentally Ill (NAMI), the National Association
of Mental Health Planning and Advisory Councils (NAMHPAC), the National
Council for Community Behavioral Healthcare (NCCBH), and the National
Mental Health Association (NMHA) to
deliver written
analysis or on-site training and technical assistance on a range of
policy issues related to the implementation of the
recommendations of
the Presidents New Freedom Commission on Mental Health. {Emphasis
added.]
Forty-five states have received technical assistance from these
groups via SAMHSA. Parents in the state of Missouri even received
training in
how to lobby for more taxpayer funds to pay for these ineffective and
dangerous programs. Every one of the organizations listed above has
a vested financial, power, or professional interest in expanding the
mental health system and has been a wholesale, uncritical supporter of
the screening and medication recommendations in the NFC report. These
groups completely ignore contradictory scientific and medical evidence.
The State Mental Health Program Directors and NAMI have received millions
of dollars in grants from the pharmaceutical industry.
NFC chairman Michael Hogan is the director of the
Ohio Mental Health Department, which was one of the first to adopt TMAP
(Texas Medication Algorithm Project). He is one of its most aggressive
promoters, and he has traveled across the country - all expenses picked
up by drug manufacturers.
Hogan also served on
an "Advisory Committee" of Janssen Pharmacia, manufacturer
of the antipsychotic Risperdal (risperidone) a TMAP-recommended first
line treatment. Thanks to Hogan and the other state mental health program
directors, TMAP has spread to at least a dozen
states and is affecting thousands of children, as young as age three, in
juvenile justice, foster care [1] and welfare programs. The cost of
these psychiatric drugs is bankrupting state Medicaid programs. Besides
being exorbitantly expensive, the drugs are ineffective. Every large
study not funded by the pharmaceutical industry has demonstrated this.
The FDA has issued stringent black box warnings, as well, for fatal side
effects of these drugs in some group of people.[2]
These points and more were discussed in a
follow-up
letter from the national coalition of concerned groups to
SAMHSA
on December 12, 2005.
Mr. Curies
reply to that letter did not address a single one of these
concerns.
It appears that SAMHSA was not really interested in answering the
concerns of EdWatch, and others about these invalid and dangerous
programs. It also appears that interests of the pharmaceutical
industry and psychiatric establishment are more important to their
lapdogs in Congress and the bureaucracy than are the rights of parents,
children and citizens.
The Abramoff scandal pales in comparison to the stench of the mental
health establishments influence over so many areas of the federal
government and, in turn, so many areas of state governments. Their
influence causes our children to be labeled in infancy, and it creates a
never-ending market for psychiatric drugs. The long term effects of these
drugs on the brains of our children are unknown. They also create a
market for other drugs used to treat the chronic side effects like
obesity and diabetes, and they will be needed throughout the lives of
those affected, enhancing drug company profits while bankrupting taxpayer
funded programs. As these programs multiply, the use of politically
motivated labeling and drugging for children who do not comply with the
indoctrination of the federal curriculum will increase. Brave New World
will appear less and less like fiction unless these programs are stopped.
What will you do to stop it? Stay tuned for more of this story and
for what you can do.
[1] Over 60% of foster children in
Texas, nearly
two-thirds in
Massachusetts,
and 55% of foster children in
Florida
are on as many as 16 different psychiatric drugs,
starting as young as age 3.
[2] For a summary of the latest studies and medical information showing
the dangers and ineffectiveness of psychiatric medications,
see here.
EdWatch is entirely user-supported. The continuation of our research
and distribution work depends upon individual contributors. To assure
that our work continues,
click here. If
you want to subscribe or unsubscribe to this EdWatch e-mail service, mail
to:
edwatch@lakes.com. Put "subscribe" or
"unsubscribe" in the SUBJECT of the message. Resources of
videos, books, and audiotapes are available on our shopping cart.