EDUCATION FOR A FREE NATION
December 2, 2005
105 Peavey Rd, Suite 116, Chaska, MN 55318
tests, and accountability -- they sound so good, but whose standards?
Whose tests? Accountability to whom? While Bill Clinton dismisses the
out-of-date concept of local control of education, the column below by
Phyllis Schlafly describes UNESCO (the UN education agency) and its
efforts to influence U.S. school curriculum. Look, for example, at
UNESCO's curriculum plans:
Declaration on the Decade for
for Sustainable Development and its
adoption by the UN. The highly politicized curriculum of sustainable
development based on the Earth Charter is described in the EdWatch
making headway? Look at
curriculum UNESCO has developed. And there's more to come, under the
name "international standards." "UNESCO's efforts in the
1960s and 1970s to influence U.S. school curriculum were unsuccessful.
But now UNESCO has found a sugar daddy," states Schlafly below.
Bill Gates Teams Up With UNESCO
Nov. 30, 2005 by Phyllis Schlafly
Read this column
President Bill Clinton made a speech on January 22, 1997 to a suburban
Chicago audience so friendly that it interrupted him with applause 29
times. One line in his speech, however, was greeted with stony silence:
"We can no longer hide behind our love of local control of the
Clinton is gone from the White House, but the federalization laws of his
Administration Goals 2000, School-to-Work, and Workforce Investment
are still in place. President George W. Bush, who says the federal
government has "a role to play in education," has merely
substituted labels more comforting to Republicans: standards, tests, and
Now we find that the process is no longer just federalization; it's
globalization. Who would have guessed that UNESCO (United Nations
Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization) would be positioning
itself to design curriculum for American schools?
President Reagan withdrew the United States from UNESCO on December 31,
1984 because it was corrupt, anti-Western, and a vehicle for far-left
propaganda. Unfortunately, President George W. Bush rejoined UNESCO in
UNESCO's efforts in the 1960s and 1970s to influence U.S. school
curriculum were unsuccessful. But now UNESCO has found a sugar daddy.
On November 17, 2004 at UNESCO's headquarters in Paris, UNESCO signed a
26-page "Cooperation Agreement" with Microsoft Corporation to
develop a "master curriculum (Syllabus)" for teacher training
in information technologies based on standards, guidelines, benchmarks,
and assessment techniques. The Agreement states that the Syllabus will
"form the basis for deriving training content to be delivered to
teachers," and "UNESCO will explore how to facilitate content
Bill Gates initialed every page in his own handwriting. You can read the
but Microsoft has fixed it so you can't print it out.
Following the signing of the Agreement, UNESCO Director General Koichiro
Matsuura explained it in a speech. One of its goals, he said, is
"fostering web-based communities of practice including content
development and worldwide curricula reflecting UNESCO values." No
doubt that is agreeable to Bill Gates because the Agreement states that
"Microsoft supports the objectives of UNESCO as stipulated in
The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation has helped to finance the National
Governors Association plan in Idaho to train students to work in the
global economy. Idaho is one of six states selected by the National
Governors Association for pilot projects.
The National Governors Report of December 2004 (when Virginia Governor
Mark Warner was chairman) makes clear that the purpose is to use the
public schools to build a planned economy. The report speaks approvingly
of "using schools to feed workers into selected corporations,"
"identifying their state's key industries and needs for skilled
workers in order to define a common agenda between their workforce and
economic development programs," "the integration of education,
economic development, and workforce development policies,"
"seamless connections between the components of the [education]
system and with the skill demands of the workplace," and
"connecting workforce development to economic needs."
It's hard to see any difference between the 2004 National Governors
Association plan and the earlier plans floated when Bill Clinton was
President. The plan uses a lot of mumbo-jumbo to change America from free
enterprise to a planned economy, and to turn public school students into
a compliant workforce for multinational corporations.
The new buzzwords are "career pathways," "education
pipeline," "redesigning high schools," "smaller
learning communities," and "cluster-based economic development
strategies." Recycled buzzwords from prior years include
"school-to-work," "workforce development system
reform," "business-education partnerships," and
"meaningful outcome measures."
Six public hearings on the proposals were held in Idaho in October, and
500 people showed up at the Boise hearing. The reaction was
overwhelmingly negative from both parents and teachers.
The Idaho Board of Education announced this month that after receiving
"hundreds of comments," it has made "modifications to
Idaho's plan to redesign high schools and middle schools," but those
changes are minimal. The original plan would have required all 6th-grade
students to select their learning plan for a specific career pathway and
choose "career focused electives" to enter the workforce.
Under the revised plan, students will have to do this only by the 8th
grade. But how many 8th graders do you know who can (or should) map out
their career pathway and narrow their education options to meet that
And what about the colossal conceit of the politicians and businessmen
who think they can predict the jobs that 8th graders can or will want to
fill in their future years? Planned economies are always a failure, and
students should be educated to reach their potential whatever it
For more information on school-to-work as part of the planned economy,
is alive and well" by Michael Chapman,
Senator lectures on educational
complacency," from the
Sun Times, and Schlafly's
Learning Communities: The New Face of School-to-Work."
EdWatch is entirely user-supported. The continuation of our research
and distribution work depends upon individual contributors. To assure
that our work continues,
click here. If
you want to subscribe or unsubscribe to this EdWatch e-mail service, mail
firstname.lastname@example.org. Put "subscribe" or
"unsubscribe" in the SUBJECT of the message. Resources of
videos, books, and audiotapes are available on our shopping cart.